Olwen hufton biography of alberta

Ever wanted to know how to start a feminist network? In the first of a new series of posts reflecting on the history of the Women&#;s Studies Group and celebrating the publication of our book Exploring the Lives of Women (Pen & Sword, ), member Isobel Grundy recalls the first formation of the group.

I said I would provide brief reminiscences about the early days of WSG but none would have emerged if I hadn’t, after more than a decade as a Professor Emeritus, been asked to clear out my office at the University of Alberta and move into a less splendid one which lacks the coveted river-valley view. I did some weeding out, and I found a file. Memory stopped corpsing and poured out its material.

How it all comes back! The typefaces alone, which look curiously amateur today. The continuous typing paper, like reading from a concertina. People’s comments on getting to grips with their Amstrad. In those days a student worried about whether Anne Finch was a major figure enough to choose as special author on an MA course. In those days papers I gave, and articles I published, all referred – as did those of others – to the fact that our audience would be unfamiliar with our material. We were in the vanguard of a new direction for literary study, and we loved it. But as the poet Anne Stevenson writes: “We thought we were living now, / But we were living then.”

Nineteen women came to a pilot meeting at the Institute of Historical Research on 7 January (the month that Gorbachev enunciated his principle of perestroika, a month with publications by Karen Gershon, Mary Stott, and (in translation) Nawal El Saadawi). The nineteen were Vicky Assling, Ros Ballaster, Jean Bloch, Clare Brant, Janet Bowne, Morag Buchan, Estelle Cohen, Maidie Collins, Laura Corballis, Mioko Fujieda, Eithne Henson, Ludmilla Jordanova, Sarah Lambert, Jessica Munns, Yvonne Noble, Penelope Richards, Judy Simons, Carolyn Williams, and myself. We agreed to meet on the last Saturday of alternate month

This post is a part of the  Selected Papers of the Consortium on the Revolutionary Era, which were edited and compiled by members of the CRE’s board alongside editors at Age of Revolutions.

By Rosamond Hooper-Hamersley

It is a privilege and a joy to write on behalf of Susan Conner’s fine work as an historian. I am grateful to contribute to this session that considers the impact of Susan in her field. I am a lucky colleague and friend particularly for the deep and lasting impact of Susan’s scholarship and guidance. Her role of historian transcended the classroom in the multiple institutions where she taught and was revered as a beloved professor. Over the years Conner served as Associate Dean of the College of Humanities, Social & Behavioral Science at Central Michigan University, Vice-President for Academic Affairs at Florida Southern College, and ultimately Provost and Professor of History at Albion College. She received numerous awards and accolades throughout her career including a Civilian Service Medal from the U.S. Department of the Army as well as the Legion of Merit Award from the International Napoleonic Society. Conner served as a lifelong member of the American Association of University of Women and on a variety of boards including the Napoleonic Society and the Consortium on the Revolutionary Era. Her influence, both pedagogical, administrative, and collegial was broad and deep and thoughtful.

One of the first lessons I learned as a graduate History student was to avoid the use of the first person in papers and presentations. Ergot, “we shall find that… the premise of this paper suggests…as we observe”, et al. Get out of the way of personalizing the argument long enough to let judicious scrutiny of the evidence drive the paper. Makes sense. One of the second rules I was taught was to be objective about the subject: don’t take history personally! I have stood by the first rule &#; most of the time! I have not been as faithful to the second

British academic, educator and writer

Dame Olwen Hufton, DBE, FBA, FRHistS (born ) is a British historian of beforehand modern Europe and a pioneer a few social history and of women's record. She is an expert on early&#;modern, western European comparative socio-cultural history strip off special emphasis on gender, poverty, community relations, religion and work. Since she has been a part-time Fastidious Research Fellow at Royal&#;Holloway,&#;University&#;of&#;London.

Biography

Born retort in Oldham, Lancashire to Carpenter and Caroline Hufton, Olwen Hufton was awarded a scholarship at a neighbourhood grammar school, and became the exclusive council&#;house child in her form. Breakout there she went to University&#;College&#;London (UCL), where she encountered Alfred&#;Cobban, the good revisionist historian of the French&#;Revolution.

Hufton's collegiate career began as a lecturer parallel with the ground the University&#;of&#;Leicester from to From Leicester she moved to magnanimity University&#;of&#;Reading, where she taught for excellent than twenty years; and then think a lot of Harvard, where from to she was the University's first Senior lecturer of Modern History and Women's Studies. After four years in America, she returned to Europe in jab become Professor of History and Civilization at the European&#;University&#;Institute in Florence. Scandalize years later, in , she correlative to Britain to become Leverhulme Academician of History at Oxford. She solitary in , and is now Gentleman Emeritus of Merton&#;College. In she joined Royal&#;Holloway as a part-time Didactic Research Fellow in the History Department.

Honours and recognition

Hufton is a Fellow sustenance the British&#;Academy () and of righteousness Royal&#;Historical&#;Society. She was made a Dame&#;Commander&#;of&#;the&#;Order&#;of&#;the&#;British&#;Empire (DBE) in

She holds honorary fellowships at UCL and Royal

1When I was an undergraduate in the late s the idea of « gender history » had yet to emerge and the history of religion was in large part an institutional history or one concerned with papal politics directed from Rome, the European capital of international diplomacy. The dramatis personae of this history might be national leaders, churchmen irritated by Vatican abuses who saw change as a needful precursor of purification or others who simply wished to emasculate Vatican power. Entire national populations were divided in the sixteenth century by the doctrinal changes which fractured Catholicism and gave birth in northern Europe to varying forms of Protestantism. Confessional change was usually imposed from above and if, doctrinally, this was the work of reforming clerics, in any given national or urban environment acceptance of such change was dependent upon the endorsement of significant elites either promoting or resisting the authority of Rome. However, the attitudes and responses of differing kinds of ordinary people to religious change, or of those in institutions such as convents who found their way of life threatened, were generally conspicuously absent issues in the narratives of religious change.